Sha Po Lang
Steve Martin has accomplished much in his career, some of it nearly brilliant, some of it…nowhere near brilliant. By the sometimes tonally diverse nature of his work, it’s not a stretch to assume he himself sees this. Hence, once he found himself well into his big screen dry spell, he apparently turned to the world of literature to express himself. His best seller “Shopgirl: A Novella”, was a mature and clear departure from the “Mixed Nuts” and “Simple Twist of Fate”s that made up the family-friendly rut he’d found himself in. Of course, the family-friendly rut couldn’t have been too bad for him, since his literary success hasn’t prevented “Bringing Down the House” and numerous “Cheaper by the Dozen” movies. So, just when it seemed that Steve Martin’s sometimes nearly brilliant big screen career was all but over, (and let’s face it, it’s been slowly downhill since “The Jerk”,) he does the obviously brilliant thing, and adapts “Shopgirl” into an elegant but true-to-bumbling-life film. No, Martin did not direct it (that honor goes to Anand Tucker), but its pretty clear that this is the actor-turned-author’s passion project, as his producer’s fingerprints are as apparent as Selznick’s or Bruckheimer’s are on their productions. The result may not be “this year’s ‘Lost in Translation’”, as some have labeled it, but that label is in the right ballpark.
Although Martin serves a duel role, as both the omniscient narrator (appropriately enough, since he’s also the screenwriter) and lonely rich guy Ray Porter, the story belongs to the title character of Mirabelle, played by Claire Danes. Mirabelle is just another girl who finds herself alone and confused in Los Angeles. Her passion lies in her overtly feminine artwork, but her livelihood is manning the glove counter at Saks Fifth Avenue, pushing gloves she herself could never afford. Following a long yet intimate opening credits tracking shot through the store (which gives new meaning to the term lipstick cam), we end up slowly dollying in on Mirabelle, framed up perfectly behind her oft-ignored glass case, quietly staring off into nowhere, flanked by the gloved outstretched mannequin arms, seemingly reaching to the heavens for something greater. At night, it’s back to her rundown apartment across town, with only her artwork and her cat to keep her company. That is, until she catches the eye of Jeremy, an eccentric penniless slacker played with the weird gusto that only Jason Schwartzman could bring to the role.
Although so much is never uttered, Jeremy is clearly not the type of guy Mirabelle had in mind for herself. His lack of shame in courting her is matched only by his ambition. It isn’t long before that said ambition puts him on a bus right out of the movie. (For fun, try noting all different ways the bus was filmed driving in and around the same country intersection every time we get an exterior shot of it on its trip across America.) In the meantime, Mirabelle is more effectively courted by Martin’s Ray Porter. The relationship isn’t perfect, but for the most part, it looks pretty darn good. Ray loves to pamper her with gifts and affection, and the sex she gives him in return exudes as much class and elegance as it screams “nudity clause” in its overly careful blocking. But, Jeremy isn’t gone for good, and eventually you may’ve guessed that this incidental love triangle must be resolved. It may sound awfully estrogen drenched, but don’t forget we’re in the hands of the mature, art-collecting “Spanish Prisoner”-stealing Steve Martin, and this is one time he’s extremely careful not to let the audience down.
“Shopgirl” may not offer anything entirely new, and Martin may no longer be the beloved wild and crazy guy of yesteryear, but in the capable hands of director Tucker, both the adaptation and its author exude the kind of intentional somber luster that so many more pretentious excursions aim for but bungle terribly. Barrington Pheloung’s entrancing music, Peter Suschitzky’s ace cinematography, and perhaps above all, the perfect casting make “Shopgirl” a well-crafted and honest tale of three people just trying find real connections in the big lonely world. Peppered with just enough awkward humor to make it all easy going down, Martin and company have delivered an absolutely worthwhile film, and by far the best date movie of the year.
- Jim Tudor
Shop at our affiliated sites and support Twitch while feeding your pop-culture addiction.
Reader Comments
Eight Rooks 10/21/2005 @ 5:52am
Nice to see someone from Twitch review this; I wasn’t sure what to make of all the mixed signals from RottenTomatoes, but Variety and the NYT liked it, and now here, so I’m cautiously optimistic again… and though it’s been a long time since I read the book I do remember enjoying it.
Eight Rooks 10/21/2005 @ 5:56am
And sorry to comment again, but from Variety:
“But the most deeply affecting moments in “Shopgirl” spring from a sense of the city as a place where disconnectedness is the norm, and isolation breeds neediness in those who are emotionally vulnerable.”
...Martin doing a Tsai Ming-Liang? Heh, now there’s a thing… :D
Kurt 10/21/2005 @ 7:21am
What, you mean Shopgirl is a better date movie than The Devils Rejects? I don’t think so!
Graeme 10/21/2005 @ 12:02pm
Sounds more like your typical “I’m drawn to LA for some existential reason that sounds better in vague words, rather than just because I’m a whore and I want lots of money” Variety bullshit.
Variety sucks.
Eight Rooks 10/21/2005 @ 3:54pm
Uh, I was making a joke; you do realise that, right?
Though I like Variety, or at least what reviews of theirs I’ve read on the web so far.
G 10/21/2005 @ 5:40pm
Jim, you’ve actually reviewed a film I want to see. First for everything
userX 11/10/2005 @ 5:55am
“dual,” not “duel,” right?… Or are you saying something about the relationship between Steve Martin’s roles and the Mirabelle character?…
-----