Rogue Pictures Presents THE UNBORN In Theaters January 9th
When my Evening Class cohort Michael Hawley joined me at the Palm Springs International earlier this year, Takashi Miike’s Big Bang Love, Juvenile A was high on his wish list; but, it was a no-show. It slipped over to his wish list for the Asian-American—again, a no-show—and then to the San Francisco International—where three strikes usually means you’re out. Leave it to Bruce Fletcher to reconfigure the ol’ ball game and bring Miike’s 65th (“or so”) film to Bay Area audiences as the opening night punch for Dead Channels Festival of Fantastic Film (Thursday, August 9, 7:30PM). We owe him a big thank you. Especially because he’s bringing this visual mindfuck to the Castro Theatre.
Call it a passing phase, or maybe even a mood, but lately scratching my head feels good in response to movies I don’t completely understand yet appreciate seeing. Nuit Noire started it with its textured self-referentiality and now Takashi Miike’s Big Bang Love, Juvenile A follows suit with its compelling visual artistry pinned up to the big screen by a few plot points. Plot, however, is not actually the point. To better describe this somewhat impenetrable film, pardon my relying on the articulations of others.
If a synopsis is required, Shochiku‘s is mercifully brief: “Jun, an employee in a gay bar, kills a customer who sexually assaults him. While being transported to jail, he meets Shiro, another young prisoner who displays his brute force from the beginning. The timid Jun is attracted to his intensity—until one of them dies, and the mystery surrounding them deepens. Inside the prison the dance continues, and outside the walls, a rocketship waits in the shadow of the ancient pyramid.”
“Has Miike gone all Von Trier on us?” Todd asked when the first stills began coming in for Big Bang Love Juvenile A, referencing the sparse, nonrealistic sets. The Gommorahizer reported on the film’s selection at the 56th Berlinale (where it was nominated for a Teddy Award) and offered up the Berlinale’s capsule.
Von Trier isn’t the only auteur being referenced. Midnight Eye‘s Tom Mes melds the references seamlessly: “Big Bang Love, Juvenile A continues where Izo left off, with an overtly homoerotic, Brechtian prison drama whose barely-lit concrete corridors echo whispers of Von Trier and Godard.” That’s right, you’ve got your conceptual prologues and your minimalist sets abstracted into tense design plus some modern dance thrown in to purposefully fuse virilified masculinity with some fluttering red chiffon. Gender fluidity in an all-male prison naturally summons up hints of Jean Genet but not so much for heavy man-on-man action as for the glowing epiphanies that aestheticize murder. Daniel Kasman, in fact, writes that Big Bang Love, Juvenile A “evokes Jean Genet’s Un chant d’amour (1950) by way of Lars von Trier’s Dogville (2003).”
Hypnotically artificial, Big Bang Love, Juvenile A “feels like a brooding existential mystery,” Chiranjit Goswami writes at Not Coming to a Theater Near You, “frequently kinetic but also periodically pensive, where young men grapple with questions concerning identity and connection.” They grapple in “scenes involving the attainment and exhibition of masculinity”, which—in gist—Goswami insinuates reflects the “complicated concerns regarding man’s ability to transform himself.” Hey, no one said becoming a man would be easy (let alone comprehensible). But more than a “mystery”, Goswami is more on track when he recognizes the cinematic exercise Miike poses with his Nouvelle Vague flourishes of “elliptical editing, jump-cuts, bold color schemes, or the hand-held cameras applied to convey the chaotic and intimidating atmosphere inside the enclosed prison cell.” Which is to say, we’re being shown something rather than told; something about creative resistance to imprisonment.
So—as I said at the very beginning—this is an admittedly confusing movie that is visually arresting and you too might find yourself scratching your head, and enjoying it. But don’t go if your third acts require resolution or some kind of clear answer or meaning to it all and don’t go if you’re expecting someone’s foot to be sawed off. Miike’s playing with something else here; something he wants to show you. Then again, what he shows you, he might take away within the scene or while shifting into the next scene. Monitor Shiro’s tattoos and let me know what you think that disappearing act is all about.
Be sure to check out Dennis Harvey’s SF360 interview with Bruce Fletcher for his keen insights into the festival line-up. And per Dave Hudson at The Greencine Daily: The San Francisco Bay Guardian‘s got more coverage of the fest opening tomorrow and running through August 16. Johnny Ray Huston writes up John Newland’s 1973 Don’t Be Afraid of the Dark and Jamaa Fanaka’s 1975 Welcome Home Brother Charles; a few of the newer titles singled out by Cheryl Eddy: Maurice Devereaux’s End of the Line, Simon Rumley’s The Living and the Dead, Jeff Roenning’s Hot Baby! and Annette Ashlie Slomka’s The Secret Life of Sarah Sheldon.
Cross-published on The Evening Class.
Shop at our affiliated sites and support Twitch while feeding your pop-culture addiction.
Reader Comments
shoujyo 08/07/2007 @ 11:50pm
I found the film visually breathtaking as well, but admittedly also found myself scratching my head. The film’s so hyper-saturated with symbolism that some of it just flies over my head. For example, I still can’t figure out what’s the deal with the pyramid and rocket. As for the tattoos, I had thought that it represented his masculinity versus his vulnerability, as they’re present during his fight scenes. But it’s not entirely consistent, so I guess that hypothesis has holes in it..
Michael Guillen 08/08/2007 @ 10:41am
But what an interesting hypothesis! I hadn’t even thought of that. When I watch the film again Thursday night, I’ll try to monitor how that holds up. Thanks for commenting, Shoujyo.
Chris 08/08/2007 @ 12:44pm
Sounds interesting. I might be able to check it out tomorrow, but most likely will have to wait for the DVD. Still, I plan on checking out a few of the Dead Channels screenings.
Do you know how much of a message Miike was trying to impart with this film, or could the parts you don’t understand be more attributed to Miike’s indulging of his prankster side, a la the ending to Dead or Alive: Hanzaisha?
Michael Guillen 08/08/2007 @ 4:45pm
I think Miike was flexing image and atmosphere. This doesn’t strike me as a real “message” movie.
Don 08/08/2007 @ 6:49pm
This comment isn’t really aimed at you Michael, but I know a lot of people view Miike as an auteur when often all he does is direct. There’s too much of a tendency to attribute everything to his vision. Nakamura Masa wrote the script based on a book by Masaki Ato, so I’d wager they had just as much (if not more) to do with shaping the film, pyramids and tattoos and all.
Michael Guillen 08/08/2007 @ 7:54pm
To be honest, I know very little about Miike, Don, though I respect your sage caution not to get carried away in praise. I’ve seen only a few of his films. Auteur theory, for me, is simply a way to get a handle on a production, a take on it, with the assumed caveat—as you’re saying—that rarely is one man’s vision the thrust of any one film. I did read your piece for Ryuganji and certainly encourage other Twitch readers to have a read of your Q&A;transcript with Miike as well. I couldn’t quite fit it into the flow of my piece but appreciate this opportunity to point it out.
logboy 08/10/2007 @ 8:07am
don’s right, i think, matches my views on miik - too much is pointed at him and it’s worthwhile to say that a lot of the variety in his work comes from the blend of his personality and the writing, and there’s also a situation where people mistakenly think the man’s a bit slapdash with his work when he’s actually showing an interesting way of blending his TV experience with filmic subject matter in order to quickly go through what’s often been v-cinema / DTV stuff which has a short life - miike’s unusual levels of imagination in his kinetic style, plus the variety i’ve mentioned, lead his to be more memorable, and more long-lasting than most if not all his contemporary v-cinema directors and actors too…