The Good, the Bad and the Weird

Goemon review

by Onderhond, December 7, 2009 5:42 AM


When Kiriya unleashed Casshern onto the masses he divided the audience like a real pro. Those of you hoping he learned from his first film will do good to lower their expectations before sitting down to watch Goemon. On the other hand, if you loved Casshern, brace yourself for another two hours of Kiriya goodness.

With Goemon Kiriya confirms his style. He makes it clear that Casshern wasn't just an accident coming from an unskilled freshman. As many "faults" his first film might have had, many of them were intentional and based on mere taste, rather than bad film making. Now I know many of you won't agree with this, but it is the simple truth.

Kiriya is not one to tell a story straight. Of course his films need a storyline, as they are over-the-top epic and he's in dire need of dramatic moments to play around with, but as a director he has other priorities. His films are extremely visual, but even visual storytelling is not really on his list of things to worry about. Just forget about the story. It's there, it's used for its hooks, but that's about it. Goemon is about the direct link between visuals and emotion. It's visual film making, not storytelling.

The Goemon character is a Japanese Robin Hood. A thief that steels from the rich and gives to the poor. A popular figure that even featured in some videogames (remember Ganbare Goemon on the SNES?) and who's name is often misspelled as Goeman or even Geoman. The film borrows a couple of other historical figures and throws them into a mix of betrayal, struggle for power and superhuman mysticism. Nothing you haven't seen a hundred times before, so I was happy enough to settle for the somewhat underdeveloped story.

Kiriya is a man of visuals. It's true that he regularly aims way to high and completely misses the mark, but those moments hardly compare to the times he does hit the spot. The first big fight scene was a pretty big let-down, so were the scenes that involved horses and ninjas running around. Whenever the scenery was supposed to flash by the CG faltered, revealing its cheap texture. The second action scene (on the boats at night) easily made up for this, so did the grand ending. But the most beautiful moments are those when the camera remains static and the exuberant details of the costumes and backgrounds can be enjoyed to their fullest. This is where Kiriya truly excels.

The soundtrack is little more than wallpaper decoration for the dramatic and epic moments. It's not really bothersome and never too present, but could've been a tad better as a whole. Acting is decent enough too, though it takes a little time to get used to the comedic interludes of Eguchi. Supporting cast is nice, with good work from Hirosue, Osawa and Okuda. But in the end, I enjoyed the role of Terajima the most. Even though it's another submissive role, he must've been quite happy to play a guy like Hanzo Hattori.

Goemon is a film where the great parts easily outshine the lesser. But only if you appreciate it for what it is. Kiriya is aiming for sensory overload and tries to connect his epic chaos directly to the nerve ends of the audience. This is a film that doesn't need brainpower, but thrives on good old-fashioned primordial thrills. If you expect the story to pull you in, either narratively or visually, you'll have little to be excited about. Seen from that angle, Goemon plays like a 2 hour recap of the whole LOTR saga with twice as much epic moments and half the emotional involvement (at least, if you're capable of that while watching films like LOTR).

Kiriya serves a roller-coaster ride, but one that makes sure that the better moments can be relived late at night while lying in bed with your eyes closed. Not everything works, it's pretty chaotic at times and it feels quite out of control. It's up to you to decide whether these are good or bad characteristics of a film. I enjoyed it a lot. With ever-improving techniques and cheaper budgets I'm sure Kiriya still has a masterpiece hidden inside of him. Until that time comes, he can keep making films like this, I'll be there to support him.
 
Rate this story:
 
 

7 Comments

user-pic

I am curious why did you bother watching that movie, I understand when its work and someone pays you, but wasting your precious time, now that is something a real movie freak would do, like I did, and lets sum it up:


Goemon - What a piece of shit!
Goemon - If you love shit then this is your movie, it is full of pure shitness!
Goemon - ***** stars a goldmine, not filled with gold but shit!
Goemon - Sit down, prepare yourself, wait for it, a rollercoaster with incredible amount of...yea you got it, shit!

I'm not a critic. I usually like movies for what they are, entertainment. I'm not trying to watch Shakespeare or anything. I watch most Asian action movies for insane martial arts and dope special effects. Which this has plenty. The end scene from Cassern is incredible if you have not scene it. They outdid that end scene with this movie. The ending has to be scene to be believed. The special effects are awesome. Do like I do watch it once and then scan through it for the fight scenes and shut up.

DJ Hannibal Beretta

user-pic

It's not so much the difference if you're paid to see films or not, it's just that when you've seen scores upon scores upon scores of films, you might start to appreciate the oddball ones a bit more, if only because they are different.

I loved Casshern and have said so often. I do not consider seeing that film a waste of my time and I can't wait to see this one.

user-pic

So maybe it's because I'm going through the whole Amityville series that this one struck me as great :p

user-pic

Jesus fucking christ, are you people like 12 or something? This is a moview review and news site, not a Twilight/anime fanclub or something. If you want to see just good reviews of the things you love go to that kind of sites. Reviewing and discussing movies aims, among other things, to discuss the merits, or lack of said merits, from a film, be a blockbuster or not. GIving a special pass to certain movies just because they're "just to pass the time" or "because they're so high art" is just plain silly. Again, if you're not interested in engaging in any discussion whatsoever and just want one-dimensional comments there are plenty of sites out there. Either grow up or actually start to think a little before going to see a movie, it won't hurt you at all.

user-pic

I can fully understand people who say that Kaz Kiriya's films are not for them. But I happen to like them and in this case that is just a matter of taste. Onderhond's comment on Kiriya's style being a result of his taste rather than his "incompetence" rings entirely true to me.

Every time Kaz Kiriya gets mentioned I drag out the story of when I saw "Casshern" (the looong version) in the cinema and what happened afterwards in the lobby: debate.
Lots of it.
People absolutely hated the movie, some loved it. There seemed to be no middle ground. One of my friends turned to me and said: "Well, every year there is one true stinker at the festival and we've found the one!". And he was astonished when I told him I'd given it the highest rating possible (the audience rates movies at the Rotterdam Festival). Both of us were not alone in our view: the group of friends I saw "Casshern" with was split right through the middle into a "loved it" and a "hated it" camp.

I'm not sure if I am one of the people ChevalierAguila deems to be "12 or something" but I don't give a special pass to movies because they're high art, low art, B or supposed crap to start with. Sometimes I do let things like annoying fanservice slide as probably being culturally mismatched to my background, and try not to let that interfere with my enjoyment of the other 98% of a film which might be brilliant. And sometimes I expect a movie to entertain me instead of moving me, and vice versa (if both happen it's always a bonus).

With "Casshern" I didn't apply any filters, and loved the film anyway. Which is why I am still looking forward to seeing "Goemon".

user-pic

I'll try to rephrase my previous post: i find silly how people go and tell somebody who gave a bad review to a movie "well, if you didn't like it why bothering reviewing it at all?" Again, what's wrong with having different opinions of the same piece of work? Be negative or positive, it also gets on my nerves how people excuse certain movies of being god awful by using such a weak argument as "it's just a movie/blockbuster/something to pass the time". Every movie ever made could easily fit into the "just to pass the time" label, why not bothering doing something actually good to pass said time?

As for Casshern, i didn't hate it, just found it boring. I was falling asleep while watching it.


Leave a comment