Sword of the Stranger

Terminator Salvation review

by Onderhond, July 10, 2009 12:03 PM

Fashionably late with my Terminator Salvation review here, just consider it a little warm-up for the DVD that's obviously going to arrive in the near future. I just saw this one in theaters here, and since there hasn't been much talk about this film since it's actual release in theaters, I might just well throw in my 5 cents.

When the latest edition in the Terminator series was announced, I had little hope for a good film. McG, director in charge, has a less than appealing portfolio and the process of reviving yet another old and popular movie series didn't really sound too creative either. But against all odds, Terminator Salvation turned out to be a worthwhile visit to the theater, although true fans of the series might be quite disappointed.

Want to find out why? Check out the full review after the break.

I've always had a rather peculiar bond with the Terminator series. Didn't really like the first film, but the no-nonsense, almost comedic approach of the second and third films really appealed to me. Since the series is rather silly story-wise, with some sci-fi nonsense and end of the world panicking thrown in for good measure, and the Terminator itself never looked all that scary or impressive to me, a darker approach felt a little out of place. The second and third films seemed to be aware of this pretty well, even made it work to their advantage.

The thing with Salvation is that it's better not to expect anything like the first three films. Although the universe and props are more or less the same, the tone of the film is completely different. They traded the 80s kitsch, more story-oriented blah and laid back nonsense for continuous big explosions and a pretty well destroyed planet Earth. This is sure to put people off, especially avid fans of the series, but I actually appreciated the change of tone, not in the least because they pulled it off quite well. If anything, it was nice to see the Terminators done in a way where they actually looked menacing and impressive.

Story-wise, this fourth installment is pretty much a complete mess. There are plot holes a plenty, depending on how much you are prepared to fill some gaps yourselves, yet the main storyline is as linear and simple as can be. And even that they couldn't get right. Little boy gets caught, Conner goes after him to free him before the resistance attacks enemy HQ. Clue of the story is that the little boy is actually Conner's father and killing the boy might result in deleting Conner altogether. Biggest question is of course why they didn't kill the boy right away, though you could argue that they wanted to lure Conner to HQ to kill them both and be absolutely sure of their annihilation. As if I would care about such trivial stuff in a Terminator film.

Anyway, Terminator Salivation is a more straightforward and easy to stomach Hollywood action film. The thing that surprised me the most was the almost impeccable styling of the film. Sure, there are plenty of films out there where things blow up and sci-fi machinery is involved, but somehow Terminator Salvation looks a lot dirtier and grittier than its Hollywood origins would have you believe. The lighting in particular is awesome, with many dark scenes dominated by a combination of monochrome color schemes. Not achieved by using simple color filters but by tweaking the actual lighting it seems.

Another surprising strong-point of Salvation is the creature design. Never been a big fan of the Terminator designs, but they look particularly sleek and sexy in this film. The big bots and flying machines too, though their designs are a little more generic. What really blew me away though were the Terminator bikes. It's very rare to see such great design potential transfered into the actual film. Usually it stays with cool concept art which is then totally butchered, but seeing those T-bikes fly by is really something.

The explosions look big and impressive, the action is energetic and the film remains visually pleasing and consistent throughout. Not so much the technical side, but the designs and lighting give the film its visual flair. It's hard to filter these films from the usual Hollywood fair as fans of these kind of films seem to have little interest in all of this and usually blabber about plot holes in a meaningless story, so more often than not I simply pass these films by not knowing what I might be missing. Which is a shame, because some of them are really worth watching.

If you think films like Terminator Salvation need a solid storyline and well-developed characters, you would do best to stay away from this film. It's a complete wreck in that department, especially if you're expecting a film that consciously and continuously supplies you with information to cover all the possible leaks in the story. To me, Terminator Salvation is about stuff blowing up, cool-looking bots and all of that set in an atmospheric context. Since that's where it delivers in spades, I'm more than happy calling Terminator Salvation a good film. As a film, it doesn't deliver all that much, but where it delivers, it actually shines.

 
 

9 Comments

user-pic

i found the action and explosions to get very dull without any meaningful context or tension around them. especially the fight on the bridge with the motorbikes bordered on parody with the whole cinema laughing at its unbelievable outcome....

user-pic

I really enjoyed Salvation. I liked it because it didn't feature Arnold and was basically a war movie, sporting Vietnam era helicopters and everything. I don't understand why some people hate on it so much as it has plenty of character and action to satisfy most out there. I guess people just wanted the same shit fed to them again.

user-pic

i enjoyed it up to the last 10mnins when the cheese kept coming hard and fast.

user-pic

I had a blast watching it. I liked the characters. The action was great. MUCH better than Transformers. I was prepared to enjoy RotF as a big, dumb summer movie, but it was TOO dumb.

user-pic

Heh, I didn't know there was an "original" ending, though I guess it makes sense seeing how the one they went with felt ridiculously tacked-on. Based on a quick Google just now, neither of the two I read make much sense, though the second could have been interesting.

And hey, sorry, but I thought Salvation was just as stupid as RotF in many respects - I enjoyed RotF far more in large part because for all Michael Bay's faults he clearly wasn't aiming for coherent storytelling or high drama (and because the 'high drama' he ended up doing without even really trying struck me as far more effective than anything in Salvation). Salvation wanted to be big and important but it had a boring, one-dimensional and completely unlikeable lead (Bale or the machines? No contest) and never succeeded in making any of the interrogation come across as anything other than petty, sadistic bullying. Not to mention plot holes, clumsy fanboy jokes, long stretches of nothing...

I loved, loved, loved huge stretches of it - the attack on the bridge and everything just before or shortly after that was absolutely stunning, I agree - but I just started grinding my teeth whenever Bale popped up, and couldn't find any part of the story that held up to any kind of close examination. Much better than I expected, but still far short of what it could have been.

user-pic

Frankly ,I don't put any of the Terminator movies up as some holy grail. Each of them does something right and much of it wrong but I still saw each of them in the theatre because they promise to deliver some decent action and explosions.

Salvation was not as bad as I had heard. Like Onderhond says, it does have good styling, nicely composed shots and integrity throughout its design. Bale is nearly boring but, surprise, the movie is mostly about Sam Worthington's character. I have to agree, last ten minutes are terrible but even after that I got my money's worth. One thing that most fans have to give credit to McG and the writers is that they extended the Terminator universe and didn't just rehash any of the movies.

user-pic

"I loved, loved, loved huge stretches of it - the attack on the bridge and everything just before or shortly after that was absolutely stunning, I agree - but I just started grinding my teeth whenever Bale popped up, and couldn’t find any part of the story that held up to any kind of close examination. Much better than I expected, but still far short of what it could have been."
- Eight Rooks

"One thing that most fans have to give credit to McG and the writers is that they extended the Terminator universe and didn’t just rehash any of the movies."
- Airchinapilot

with that I have to agree. ;) But I don't think Bale ruined any parts of the movie cause frankly the movie was not about him - that's why I think the original ending would have suited better the choices made. And as Airchinapilot said, Worthington made it interesting.

user-pic

I enjoyed it and was suprised to see that humans still had access to military resorces like A-10 thunderbolts and helicopters.

user-pic

Better than 1 and 3, but far short of 2. Not a typical Terminator film in the sense that it's not a straight up cat and mouse chase (though there are parts of it that are), but instead a "war movie." I thought it was well done. It's biggest "sin" if anything, is being part of a series that doesn't have enough legs to resonate with the public without that big Austrian guy. For many, Terminator = Arnold. It's not like Star Trek or Star Wars where they name and franchise itself are so beloved that you can put anyone in it and people will see it. I liked it. It was far better than Wolverine and Transformers, which were utter shit, but I can see why it underwhelmed at the box office.