Bullet Ballet

TRANSFORMERS: REVENGE OF THE FALLEN review

by Eight Rooks, June 23, 2009 5:22 PM


There are robots. Good robots and [b]bad[/b] robots, and they... look, if you really need an introduction, may we suggest Wikipedia? You want to know if the film's worth your hard-earned time and money? Things explode. You want to know more, read on after the break.

If there were a literate adult in the western world who knew next to nothing about modern-day American film-making it would probably take them a few hours at most to discover Michael Bay is (still) the discerning cineaste's whipping-boy of choice. And yet few people seem too eager to consider whether or not such widespread derision might be a [b]bad[/b] thing. Even in the age of the new internet optimism it's practically set in stone that the 44-year-old director has given the world nothing beyond a string of terrible, terrible movies where things explode and anyone who enjoys them ought to refrain from displaying their appreciation until they're behind closed doors and away from polite company. Should anyone find fault with Paul Greengrass or Christopher Nolan's handling of frenetic hand-to-hand set-pieces their fans will laugh the offending critic out of the room, yet at the same time the same people have no problem with laying into Michael Bay's love of hyper-kinetic action and rapid-fire jump-cutting.

Partly this has to be down to its being near impossible to argue the man's detractors don't have a case against him. It's difficult to deny Bay represents the worst tendencies of modern-day American film-making, something which sounds perfectly convincing to anyone after, say, half an hour with any of his back catalogue – excess for the sake of excess and a near total lack of structure, subtlety, restraint or narrative coherence. He scorns his critics' opinions, blissfully unconcerned with what anyone thinks of him beyond his legions of adoring devotees.

Barely fifteen minutes in, [i]Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen[/i] doesn't seem likely to bring the man many new converts, or make defending him any easier. Making a sequel for the fans is one thing, yet [i]Revenge of the Fallen[/i] opens astonishingly lazily by anyone's standards. A perfunctory voiceover by way of an introduction, some brief glimpses of one or two of the supporting cast from the original, and then Bay opens the throttle, leaving anyone new to the franchise in the dust. The [b]good[/b] robots are hunting down the [b]bad[/b] robots with the aid of a small contingent of human special operatives whose main role seems to be to die in almost farcical displays of pointless heroism. Steve Jablonsky's score thunders into action. The camera contorts wildly around hundreds of man-hours worth of ILM's work tearing across the screen. People shout incoherent military jargon. Things explode. It seems not unlike a convenient shopping list of reasons to walk out of the theatre in disgust.

Then Optimus Prime actually appears on screen and abruptly the viewer's inner child is jolted wide awake. The heroes' leader rolls out of an American military transport in vehicle form, transforms to humanoid guise on the way down, deploys multiple parachutes to slow his descent and then changes back into a Peterbilt just before hitting the road – it's over in minutes but this fairly ludicrous conceit is executed with such obvious glee it's enough to remind anyone why they came back for more after the first film.

Not that anyone would return for the plot, such as it is. A piece fell off the original macguffin, dire warnings foreshadow evil robot leader Megatron's return from a watery grave to claim said piece and hijinks ensue. Roberto Orci, Alex Kurtzman and Ehren Kruger's script attempts to flesh out the franchise's lore with further nods to the original cartoon, but the trio seem well aware their target audience are largely concerned neither with this nor the ongoing subplot about Shia LaBeouf's Sam Witwicky and his attempts to balance saving the world and going to college.

Yet for all the mechanical efficiency on display it's hard to shake the impression that [b]Bay[/b] cares, much as he directed even the most embarrassing missteps in the first [i]Transformers[/i] with the same boyish enthusiasm he showed for everything else up to the final, dizzying set-piece. A early reminder soon after the opening pyrotechnics that the macguffin has the power to bring inert mechanical objects to life is another excuse to blow things up, true – half the Witwicky family home in this case. It's also a captivating display of artistic invention and a genuinely funny poke at the idiocies of much of the backstory thus far. [i]Revenge of the Fallen[/i] doesn't preclude the inevitable [i]Simpsons[/i] episode satirising the film, but at times it manages a fair stab at sending itself up.

The main issue, though, is simply that Bay seems unable to maintain this form for much longer than he prefers to hold a camera in place. Too much of his caring feels like the guileless invitation of a child who just wants someone to come and see what they've done, with praise almost an afterthought. As a result, for every high point there's a maddening low which almost begs to be savaged. The lengthy fight scene on the edge of a forest (the one that graces the trailer) is astonishing, Optimus Prime defending Shia LaBeouf from multiple enemies, Bay's camera skipping effortlessly from point-blank to bird's eye views – not to mention the writers appear to have realised no-one cares what sort of gruesome carnage they visit on the robot cast. The results are frequently shocking; what other summer blockbuster shows a fight where the victor tears the loser's head in half with his bare hands? Yet weirdly this rarely feels like part of the problem; far more pressing is how (relatively) lengthy sequences concentrate on multiple CG protagonists sporting identical colour schemes, with designs incorporating painfully similar geometric forms, and nothing done to help the audience pick one out from the other.

And it goes on. We have an elderly Transformer – yes, you read that right – where Michael Bay somehow manages to invest the character with a degree of warmth, dignity and gravitas. Then he follows this with fart jokes. For every gag that hits the mark, he insists on running the next into the ground; if anyone missed Bay's trademark fetish for small, ugly, over-sexed canines by the halfway point he's evidently determined they [b]will[/b] catch on by the end of the film. The camera's lingering on a scantily-clad Megan Fox persistently undermines any attempt she makes to act, even before the introduction of what is quite possibly the most ludicrous femme fatale in the history of the medium. Shia LaBeouf orders Mr & Mrs Witwicky to head for safety before the climactic showdown and Bay, astonishingly, turns this into a fairly effective Big Moment – yet the earlier routine where Sam's parents visit his new dorm (there are cookies with a secret ingredient) has to rank as one of the most cringingly awful attempts at comedy ever seen outside of a Rob Schneider vehicle. [i]Revenge of the Fallen[/i] is a mess.

But it can be fun watching a child turned loose on the biggest sandpit in the world. Anyone (other than Bay and his armies of the faithful) would struggle to call the [i]Transformers[/i] sequel a [b]good[/b] film, but for those who can stay focused throughout its mammoth two-and-a-half-hour running time it's a more than enjoyable experience. It's frustrating thinking of the movie it [b]could[/b] have been if Michael Bay could sit still for more than thirty seconds at a time; if someone would suggest to him not all jokes bear shouting out to everyone in earshot; if twenty minutes or more could have been left in the editing suite...

And then the climax rolls around and Bay drags together multiple viewpoints with slick, practised expertise, reminding us that even when scrappy, lazy, greedy or flagrantly egotistical, few other directors make big-screen escapism feel so gloriously, thrillingly indulgent. [b]That[/b] theme kicks in. The human contingent actually make a difference, grunts as well as top billing, to the point the viewer even ends up emotionally invested in the endless parade of redshirts. The pyrotechnics elicit a sense of shock and awe that actually works with the pacing to staggering effect. Camerawork and set-pieces both convey a sense of scale that dwarfs anything that came before the final half hour. Again, Bay actually finds time to dwell on a pivotal moment without hysterical emoting or overly literal dialogue for those who failed to 'get' the underlying themes. We care. We're willing to overlook the mess, the sensory overload, the none-too-subtle winks to the audience, the plot holes... even the robot testicles.

[i]Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen[/i] is neither a 'good' film, nor is it going to appeal to everyone, and many of those who walk out of the theatre happy will have forgotten it before the BluRay release hits the shelves. But it's hard for anyone with an open mind not to watch it and feel there's far more honest enjoyment to be had with Michael Bay and his box of glittering toys than there is in the company of any number of critically acclaimed directors. It's childish, certainly, but sometimes we forget how much fun it can really be to watch things explode.

More from TRANSFORMERS: REVENGE OF THE FALLEN:

More from Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen:

 
Rate this story:
 
 

23 Comments

user-pic

I really thought I would of liked this movie but I was disappointed when I saw it.

user-pic

well, can't really go into the details here about why DK is great and why Transformers is not. for one, there are many brilliantly written reviews out there already. and secondly, it would take too much time and space here.

but to put it simply, blowing shit up real good is like when you were a kid and you destroyed your Lego set. meaning, that kind of excitement, ie. the Transformers/Bay kind, inspires and excites the juvenile side of us. nothing wrong with that. i enjoy watching this kind of Cinema Of Spectacle too.

but to call it "talent," well i politely disagree. with a huge budget, a good effects company like ILM, i dont think its that hard to blow shit up real good. for example, even a director like Ang Lee, inexperienced in doing action, could pull off a relatively exciting action chase sequence in Hulk.

"talent" takes much more, as i described in my previous comment.

user-pic

Before this gets any further I'd like to point out that while we do appreciate heated conflicting opinions we also demand that people don't do personal attacks or excessive swearing, both in the comments and in the forum.

The line ain't that difficult to see. Everyone please mind not to cross it...

user-pic

Point taken, X. My opinion still stands, like I said. But I concede I could have found a better way to word that. Again, sorry if I offended you, though I guess the basic idea I don't like your (or anyone's) dismissal of mister Bay's oeuvre isn't going to sit well regardless.

This really wasn't meant as being contrary for the sake of it, even so. Based on every piece of public derision and critical thought I've read over more than ten years versus the visceral [i]and[/i] more intellectual enjoyment I've had out of them I'm pretty convinced a lot of people dismiss Michael Bay's films out of hand largely because he's Michael Bay. I don't enjoy reading those critics who seem to belong to this school of thought. I paid my money for a ticket, enjoyed myself and wanted to write a review saying as far as I was concerned that while the bad stuff was frequently horrendous, the good stuff was very good, plainly obvious onscreen and that I didn't really understand how people can't cherry-pick and have fun with the high points while trying to forget about the lows.

If people say "Fair enough, good review, but sorry, I just can't see past the whole AMERICA FUCK YEAH aspect" (or words to that effect) then so be it. If they don't offer anything beyond, say, [url=http://www.channel4.com/film/reviews/film.jsp?id=171552§ion=review]this 'review'[/url], then... well, it's not as if I'm going to lose any sleep over it, but I'm not really going to change my mind.

user-pic

I'll happily take some lumps here.

The Rock and Bad Boys 2 are fantastically entertaining action films.

user-pic

I can't wait to see this my son is always asking when can he see it. I guess I need to give in.

user-pic

Sometimes I'm almost certain that Bay's multi-million dollar Hollywood mansion has the world's largest Hotel Painting and Art collection hanging at absolutely perfect angles in every room.

user-pic

Very well-written review.

So well-written, it goes right over the heads of the majority of people who are going to watch this film.

I won't deny it. It's nice to see someone twist the knife.
It's even better when the writing's not mono-syllabic or catered for the mental equivalent of a twelve year old. Good on you sir.

As for old Horse-Face himself, I'm convinced the conventions and techniques he consistently utilizes in his works represent some kind of deep-seeded issue or complex, instilled in him during pubescence. I'm thinking something along the lines of Vagina Envy.

It's definitely true that many, if not all, action movies feature some highly sexual female throwing her jazz around the place for ninety minutes. That's merely repression being alleviated. But Bay's insistence on displaying well-built men running in slow motion, in conjunction with this, just screams inner torment and confusion.

Now, if I wanted to get really freudian, I'd also make the comparison of guns and explosions to penetration and the all-important "climax", but there comes a time when even I just want to see giant robots knock the living shit out of each other.

user-pic

Todd!?

Was the stuff I said when defending Gaspar Noe as mean as what Rhythm X is saying?

user-pic

ForgottenFilms, let's not try and make it into a match who was worse, OK? We LIKE you. I'm not so sure we think the same about the other guy.

As it turned out someone was lucky today. By the time the harsher mods showed up, Eight Rooks was already involved in a conversation with the culprit. Which saved Rhythm X as it felt impolite to kick his ass in the middle of a dispute.

user-pic

BUT - I don't want to cause trouble here, or get my ass kicked, or whatever, so I'll leave this topic to others. I really have nothing more to add.

user-pic

well, having said all that, i would say Bay IS talented in one area: like James Cameron (whom i think is infinitely more talented), Bay is also a studio man. he is able to keep things within budget and on schedule. and doing that while making a huge blockbuster like Transformers, which must logistically be a nightmare, must take some form of "talent."

btw, Todd, Bad Boys 2 is a terrible movie! Bad Boys 1 was so much better and is the only Bay movie i ever really enjoyed.

user-pic

Whatever gets your testosterone up, I guess. I'll go along with 8r's post and not pick nits with his extended stylings. A lot of folks 'around these parts' heap respect on humans kickin the choreographed crap outta one another, or playing with guns. A story doesn't redeem that unless you accept the violence--a moderately attractive yet horribly tacky shell around something frightening and insidious.

user-pic

See, now that's what I don't understand. How can Commando be fun, and yet Bay is a complete hack?

user-pic

Bad dialog, camera work, writing, and two of the most racist characters since Jar Jar Binks. I hated the first Transformers movie, but honestly didn't think the sequel could be that much worse, but Bay proved me wrong.

user-pic

The last time I went into a theatre to watch a Michael Bay "movie", somebody (my sister) had to pay me the ticket. First I was giggling, then laughing out loud, then I became agressive, shouting in the movie theatre insults and other things about that piece of crap. Since I always have violent reactions when somebody's making me angry in a theatre (eating, talking, whatever), I decided I would NEVER see another Michael Bay "movie" in a theatre, even when somebody would pay me the ticket. I have never regretted my EASY decision.

Michael Bay is a prick, he's not talented AT ALL, and I'm betting he's 100 dumb. Transformers will make lots of money, 'cause most people don't care about the quality of movies they pay to see, simply 'cause they don't know what a quality movie is. In the meantime, I'll just trash that movie everytime I'll hear people talking about it. Call it duty.

user-pic

i saw this movie today. what's your take on the strong racist undertones in its depiction of stereotypes ? I was reminded of a minstrel show with CGI.

user-pic

Great review Eight Rooks. Agree with Todd too that Bad Boys and The Rock are thoroughly entertaining. Trans 2 is absolutely a complete mess and you wonder what sort of a film another director would've made of it, or indeed Bay would have if he was reigned in a bit. The key point here is in "honest enjoyment" and I whole heartedly agree that it's totally totally true to what it sets out to do. It knows it's a crass, childish, vulgar spectacle of the highest (or lowest) order and whatever one says about Bay, he's not stupid. Yes it's a cynical, massively flawed movie that exists purely to rinse as much cash from the public as possible, but all involved know this and it comes through on screen. And I liked the robot testicles...and chuckled my way through much of the film. Entertainment indeed.

user-pic

Lot of Bay hatred.
Can't say I blame them.

I particularly hate the way his films leave a distinct American taste in this Europeans mouth.
But on the other hand, it's films like Transformers or Bad Boys that make me enjoy foreign and independent cinema all the more.
The irony is that his films actually helped me seek out and discover other works that have left his in the dust.

In that sense I have to be grateful.

I don't like saying it, but Bay and in fact the whole Hollywood machine of bastardized cinema is a necessary evil. It brings a bent sense of balance to the battle of ART Vs ENTERTAINMENT.

user-pic

Love the review, touches on so many of the same points as I, we seem to be in fair agreement here. Bay has talent and aptitude too often misinterpreted as an unhealthy fondness for sunsets and car wax. He will one day create a masterpiece of action Cinema. The Rock comes close, but the best I feel is yet to come. Transformers 2 is far from this mark and for the most part is less satisfying than being beaten in the face with a pot lid. The humour almost completely fails and much of the action is impossible to follow, but there is an aesthetic present, a framing, a palette that is beautiful, but which he insists on chopping up so finely we can no longer see it, nor believe it was ever there.

user-pic

I have no problem with Michael Bay by default as it seems some have each time he makes a movie.I love the way he shoots the action scenes and he is THE MAN in making explosions look awesome on the big screen. My problem is with the scrips being infested with bad dialog,cheap silly gags, jokes and embarrassing bantering between characters that makes the cast look childish,and dare I say sometimes seem slightly mentally challenged. If the cast were kids it would have been understandable and quite frankly more natural way of behaving if imminent death was near. But in every Michael Bay movie the cast are adults,so any illusion of this being set in a "normal" universe is completely gone. I know most of his movies are PG-13, thus made for teenagers, but making the adult cast act like a bunch of kids is not cool or funny.The only way this can ever work is if the movie is dealing with stories similar to what was done in Big.I had no problem believing Tom Hanks being a kid in that movie.Other possible ideas are magic or brain transplantation gone wrong.

But pure action movies the was Michael Bay makes them cannot justify the characters acting the way they do.It`s sad to see the actors not having any integrity to say no to such movies.I hate what it does to them,and they can`t blame anyone but themselves if they get forever typecast after doing such movies.I let it slide in Bad Boys, as both Will Smith and Martin Lawrence only acts in one particular way in any movie,but I was really fed up with the whole thing in Bad Boys 2.The violence in that movie was quite over the top and the characters were a bunch of reckless idiots acting outside any laws,rules or any human moral that are the pillars of the modern society.They they were suppose to be portraying the role of cops,defenders of the law.The whole thing was like seeing a Ren & Stimpy episode.The Lethal Weapon series were over the top too,but still the script tried to justify why Mel Gibsons character Sergeant Martin Riggs acted like way he did.He was a loose cannon,borderline suicidal and work was the only thing he had left in his life.

The only Michael Bay movies that are played straight for about 99% of the time are The Rock and The Island.For that reason those movies are very good.I personally think The Rock is one of the best action movies of the 90`s.The silly jokes were sadly back in full gear in the first Transformers movie,mostly the lame jokes was played on the robots.These were not old high tech skilled fighting robots that had been forever been at war.No they where a bunch of teenage robots ,not done growing thus making them clumsy giants walking around not caring about anything while making jokes and talking trash.Most scenes without any fighting were poorly scripted and made the robots look like poorly trained puppy dogs that needed constant supervision.The scene with he parents in the house and Shia LaBeouf yelling at the robots as they mess up the lawn and surrounding area make me cringe each time is see this movie.I would have been funny in a cartoon episode,but this was set in "real" life making the whole scene look riddicilus.If this was to be a kids movie,as the series was,have the whole cast be kids and the robots be kids.Let them all play fight without any weapons that surly belongs to the grownups world.The trend these days is to make a kids movie with mostly all adult cast, set in the real world dealing with adult topics while the violence is bloodless and family friendly.It can`t work,and it doesn`t work story wise,and the only reason it works financially is the fact that kids/teenagers always run to the cinema to see these special effect smorgasbords.I can`t blame them as I also love seeing shit being blown up too with epic special effects,but my heart bleeds each time I see these movies as they are dumbing down the scrips to please the masses.

I would rather see a R rated Transformers movie series making these robots from outer space act like a bunch of hard core killing machines that just happens to drop down on planet earth to fight a couple of rounds and hardly noticing the people around them.I mean why should they care about us,we are an inferior low tech race that die very easily.The way they fight without caring about the human suffering,we are forced to try to find their weaknesses and try to fight back as we as facing an extinction of the human race.Perhaps this is not the most original story in the world,but if the lame jokes were gone and the action was hard without any bullshit I would pay good money to see it.

user-pic

Bay's directing style is awful in every way possible. Armageddon is a prime example of that, there's barely any shot in that movie that lasts more than 5 seconds. It's annoying, headache inducing and makes me want to punch kittens.

user-pic

I dont know what's with all this "Transformers ROTF is not a GOOD film?" I currently live here in the Philippines and movie-tickets here are cheap. So, Yes, I have seen the movie twice and would willingly watch it for a third time. Yes, ladies and gents it is that good. I admit the movie had some flaws like I wasn't so in with the DEVASTATOR concept and how a merely human designed laser cannon was able to topple him. This task is supposed to be left to the DINOBOTS hehehe. Also, some DECEPTICON designs are a bit clone-ish, BUT!!! apart from all that this movie brings the inner TRANSFAN in me. And as for M.Bay goes, I kinda dig him now for bringing JET CONVOY(SPOILER!!!) in to live screens. What's that? You dont know what that is? Watch the movie first then search it via wikipedia.