Still Life

DEATH RACE Review

by Todd Brown, July 25, 2008 1:24 AM

Ladies and gentlemen, the race is over. The competition is won. The arrival of Paul W.S. Anderson's Death Race - even though it comes so very early in the year - has put a conclusive end to the race for the 2008 Razzie Awards. Worst film? Worst director? Worst screenplay? Worst actress? Not only will Death Race take all of these categories but the competition won't even be close. There is quite simply no chance whatsoever that any other film will arrive on the scene to rival this - the latest in a long, ling line of very, very bad films from Anderson - for if anyone should even attempt to create another film at this level of ineptitude within the rest of the calendar year I have no doubt that the universe would spontaneously implode in protest of having to play host to such an indignity. This, people, is a Very Bad Film.

On the surface, a remake of the Roger Corman-produced cult flick would seem apropos, even timely right now. Death Race is a title primed to both exploit and comment upon the current craze for 'extreme' - read, 'hyper violent' - sport and the society that consumes it but there is neither the will nor the brain at work here to offer any sort of commentary whatsoever, nor the skill to properly exploit it. What do we have? Jason Statham is Jensen Aimes, a near future steel worker and former race car driver thrown out of work when the mill he works at shuts down, leaving him unable to provide for his wife and infant daughter. It's not like he has long to worry about that, though, because the very same day Aimes is thrown out of work masked men invade his home, kill his wife, and leave Aimes unconscious with a bloody knife in his hand. Six months later he has a life term in prison.

But prisons are different in the future. They have become privately run, for-profit organizations. Rehabilitation? What's that? The prisoners are fodder for extreme sports, corpses-in-waiting destined to battle it out for massive pay-per-view online audiences with potential release dangled in front of their eyes as a prize should they succeed multiple times in the gladiatorial combats. And the most successful of these games, the highest rated sport, is the Death Race - a three day, multi stage race run by prisoners in cars heavily modified to include steel armor and heavy weaponry. Hmm ... new guy in prison happnes to be a driver, and the next Death Race is just days away, there couldn't be a conspiracy at play here, could there? Of course there is! The prison warden orchestrated the killing of Aimes' wife and his subsequent conviction, needing him to replace Frankenstein, a popular masked driver killed (though nobody knows that) in the last race. Bloodshed ensues.

For a brief, shining moment I actually though Death Race may end up being a servicable B-flick on the strength of it's cast - arguably the best Anderson has ever had to work with. Sure, Statham aint a great actor, and he never has been, but he's a charismatic guy, easily able to chew his way through this stuff. Throw the dependable Joan Allen and brilliant Deadwood baddie Ian McShane into the key support roles and this could actually work, right? Oh, hell no. The film fails on so many levels it's hard to keep count.

The blame, first of all, should rest at the feet of Paul W.S. Anderson. His direction is horrible, with the exception of a couple of admittedly stellar shots the car race scenes are actually kind of cluttered and boring, several normally solid bit players turn in career worst performances and the Anderson-written script is laughably, horribly bad. We like to joke about plot holes big enough to drive a truck through but this film has plot holes that people LITERALLY drive actual trucks through with nobody so much as batting an eyelash. And the dialog ... oh, the dialog ... but more on that later ... Anderson wears a LOT of hats on this film and, without belaboring the point, it is very safe to say that the work he turns in for every single role he is supposed to fill is appallingly below standard.

The blame, second of all, should rest at the feet of the cast. Not Statham so much - he'll brush this one off easily enough - or McShane, who is absolutely the only performer to rise above the level of the script he's given to turn in something approaching a compelling performance, but all the rest are horrible. Tyrese Gibson hits an all time low as the primary on-track villain. Natalie Martinez as Statham's navigator / love interest? Utterly abysmal every time she opens her mouth, but honestly she was cast for her cleavage not her ability to deliver a line and the cleavage is just fine, thanks, so it's hard to fault her too much. But Joan Allen? Oh, Joan, what were you thinking? Did you not read the script when they sent it to you? When we get to hear Morgan Freeman cuss in Wanted it ends up being a high point of the film because Freeman so clearly is having a blast playing so far against type, he delivers the line so incredibly well, and it fits within the world Wanted has created. But when Allen cautions Statham, "Fuck with me and we'll find out who shits on the sidewalk." the response is just, WHAT? What the hell? What does that even MEAN? Never mind that the delivery's clumsy, that's just NONSENSE! And nonsense is never, ever bad-ass. Oh, Joan, I know I can't blame you for writing it, but you agreed to say it and you really, really should have known better.

So, the film's horrible. That leaves the question of whether this is a so-bad-its-good sort of film. Well, once the first openly mocking laugh burst out about half way through the screening I attended the crowd loosened up noticeably and got into the jeering spirit. Did we have a good time? Yes, yes we did. But, importantly, none of us had paid to be there. And, honestly, I can't imagine any paying, sober audience being happy about having to sit through this.

 
 

23 Comments

user-pic

So...you're saying you didn't like the movie?

user-pic

Perhaps Haneke would have done a better job with the film? :)

user-pic

Lololololol.
"fuck with me and we'll find out who shits on the sidewalk."
lololololol.

Holy shit. Best. Line. Ever. Seriously. I'll drop ten bucks just for that. I can't stop laughing. I whole heartly hope that the whole movie is as abstractly retarded as that one line.

user-pic

Oh, yeah, that bit is brilliantly stupid and, yes, there are more like it. The 'race car reflexes' bit that came a bit earlier (if I've got the sequence right, my brain kind of shut down) is where I really lost it, myself ...

user-pic

Strangely, my anticipation is even higher for this now. When Statham makes a turkey, it's a gorgeous bird to behold. IN THE NAME OF THE KING, REVOLVER, apparently now this... all beautiful for very different, sick reasons.

user-pic

LOL.I love reading reviews for crappy films. The descriptions are always hilarious: "if anyone should even attempt to create another film at this level of ineptitude within the rest of the calendar year I have no doubt that the universe would spontaneously implode in protest of having to play host to such an indignity."

I have to agree with the others. I actually want to see this now just so I can laugh my way through it. I think I'll wait for the dvd though. It probably won't take long anyway.

user-pic

Oh I only wish this movies was a docu on actual Nascar drivers and fans... Please lord make it come true...

user-pic

So, from the opening tone of the critique - it actually sounded like you thought this was going to be GOOD. Or that at least you were HOPING the latest film from PWSA would be a smart and cool treatment.
Did you really think something that had such cheesy source material would accidentally just turn itself cool as it went inside out by adding some nu-metal songs, a Mustang and a director who's batting .1000 at Suckball?

user-pic

(And I swear, do all Jason Statham movies use the same grim head-shot in their posters?)

user-pic

I guess my only surprise about this review is that (and this is me agreeing with Sonaboy) you seemed pretty shell-shocked by how bad it actually ended up being. It'd seem that you would know what you were getting yourself into with Anderson's past "triumphs".

Either way, kudos for taking the bullet for us man, thanks for the entertaining review and I think we might have another contender for my "favorite movies to watch while drunk of my ass list".

user-pic

You talk about this as if the original were some kind of masterpiece. It's not. It's a fun B-movie,but it's highly unlikely that this movie will ruin its reputation.

I'm still seeing it.

user-pic

It's no masterpiece but it's smart as hell and has more substance than this apparent dreg.

user-pic

I wish Statham's career wasn't determined on him driving cars...

user-pic

Why is a surprise that Statham will pick a movie like this one? The guy is very limited actor, and he already fell into the action movie cliche long time ago.

user-pic

I'm confused. Who exactly will be shitting on the sidewalk?

user-pic

“Fuck with me and we’ll find out who shits on the sidewalk.”

I agree with the others, this was definitely one of the funniest lines I have ever heard. Great review Todd. The film might be total crap but your review was perfect (although I wish we had more examples taken from the film to laugh at).

I lost confidence in Anderson quite a while ago and it has always annoyed me when his films were shit but not shit enough to stop him making films. I truly hope this film performs as badly as it sounds and his future would-be films are given to other directors. We need more films directed by different people and not more films directed by this incompetent man. At least Uwe Boll knows he is shit and enjoys creating shit. Anderson is far better paid and far more dangerous given the high profile films he directs and subsequently ruins.

user-pic

I'll watch it, but I doubt I'll pay for it. At least anything more than a rental fee. Thanks for the entertaining review. That made my morning.

user-pic

Sounds like The Condemned meets Spy Hunter...

In fact, the whole film feels like a dry run for Anderson's next film (Spy Hunter!).

Criminals as gladiators in futuristic games also reminds me of Temmink - a far superior film, I'm sure.

user-pic

Damn. I was hoping this would be something along the lines of Doomsday... ya know, full of awesomeness. But I'll pay enough money to see something else and then screen-hop into this one just for the Joan Allen-speak. At least I'll know what to expect now.

user-pic

Was this as much like SPEED RACER's Mirror Universe counterpart as Anderson was claiming in that MTV interview where he [i]spoiled the end of his own movie[/i]? I might give it the eventual rental for that alone.

They're [i]still[/i] trying to make SPY HUNTER? Christ, why? Unless the whole thing's filmed from a helicopter and the guy never gets out of the car.

Best thing to come out of this DEATH RACE debacle - The Asylum making DEATH RACERS starring the Insane Clown Posse as the Insane Clown Posse. It's not the first time Asylum has ripped off a remake, but it might be the first time the Asylum's version looked more like the original film than the "official" remake does, and they also seem to be trying to cover SPEED RACER and DEATH RACE with one film.

user-pic

I came to experience this awesome film after I became annoyed with a
crowded theater for 'The Dark Knight.' Like many others, I had
neither the interest nor the exception for this film to be so
amazingly exciting, that I would bother to see it twice in a day!

If you aren't too incredibly busy showing-off your Criterion
Collection DVD's or pretending to be some kind of Socialite Film
Connoisseur, maybe you too could experience the fun and excitement of
this fast and unrelenting Summer Blockbuster!

Both Joan Allen and an unexpected Ian McShane made this adventure
that much more enjoyable - as even the casting of other peripheral
character where also notable - and kept a certain momentum, as you
could never expect the next twist of characters and story.

user-pic

I'm a college grad with a degree in creative writing. I am a long time lover of science fiction books and action films. I was going to enjoy watching this movie relaxed on the couch. Less than 10 seconds after the warning I sat up. From that moment on I enjoyed and examined everything until the credits rolled. This movie is the first movie that I have ever sat through more than five minutes of the audio commentary. I ended up watching the entire movie twice and the entire credits once. This movie was made with painstaking detail from start to finish. Every second of screen-time, like the script was intentional.

To say there is no commentary discounts Robert Heinlein's work on his novels "Starship Troopers," "Stranger in a Strange Land," and "Farnham's Freehold."
These are but a few of the many examples I can give of social commentary rooted in well thought out science fiction. I have yet to see "Death Race 2000," but I expect the social commentary to fall significantly short of the remake. I have watched many films from that time period that a reviewer reveres. My experience has been that the social commentary from the originals can be summed up in two sentences or less.

In short this is one of the best scifi films I've ever seen and I don't expect to see a better one anytime soon.

user-pic

Well if a college grad says so.