Fourteen is a tough age. So the mysterious agents of exposition often remind us in this latest adolescent fantasy yarn. As the forces of Hollywood gather to fill the pending void left by the Great One Harry Potter, Walden Media – that mighty arbiter of bible belt-approved fantasy films (“Holes”, “The Chronicles of Narnia” series) – has stepped up with this latest offering, “The Seeker”. (The actual onscreen title remains “The Seeker – The Dark is Rising”, although word has gone out that the official title is simply “The Seeker”. At least the overused song by The Who of the same name doesn’t play for once.) Equal parts transparent and thoroughly satisfying, this film came as a bit of a surprise. Engaging, well acted, and appropriately scary, “The Seeker” comes recommended for its intended age group.
The plot (based on the novel “The Dark is Rising”, by Susan Cooper) isn’t going to win any awards for originality. A young boy, Will Stanton, (Alexander Ludwig) while living in England with his large family, is informed on his fourteenth birthday that he has special powers, and is the last hope for humankind against the forces of darkness. These forces of darkness are represented primarily by The Rider (Christopher Eccleston), and the various computer generated dark clouds and scary animals he brings with him. Will must use his new powers to travel through time and retrieve the all-important six magical “signs” that will make him strong enough to thwart the Darkness. Somehow, director David L. Cunningham manages to competently wring the proper threat level from all of this.
Of course, just beneath the surface of the metaphorical fantasy plot is a tale of early teen angst. It could be argued that many of the represented anxieties are dealt with in an unhealthy manner, particularly that of the beautiful older girl/crush object that overlooks young Will in favor of his older brother. On the flip side, however, this same scenario can be justified as a kid-safe probing of the perils of hormonal temptation. But “The Seeker” isn’t at all advocating repression so much as focus, discipline, and ultimately, great freedom. The film seems to be saying that adolescence is a dangerous and vulnerable time, but can also be a time of positive coming of age – if the correct decisions are made. All of the loneliness and changes in Will’s life must be honed into strengths at this particular moment, or the future is doomed. He is caught up in a spiritual war that must be fought. And fought it is - even if the causalities he suffers are particularly inconsequential.
We’ve seen all of this before in various ways in everything from “Buffy the Vampire Slayer” to Joseph Campbell, but the worldview of “The Seeker” is assuredly varied from those sources. Seeing that both Cunningham and Walden Media operate within the realm of conservative values, it is no surprise that both the strengths and weaknesses of this film stem from there. Fortunately, the impressive production values and high-caliber acting (Ian McShane handles his would-be contrived role of expository mentor with a proper hard-lined assuredness) raise this film out of the danger zone of embarrassing mediocrity that such attempted projects often occupy; the good outweighing the bad. If anything, “The Seeker” openly and successfully embraces the tradition of high quality values-based fantasy - more so than the chronically dull “The Chronicles of Narnia: The Lion, The Witch, and the Wardrobe”.
“The Seeker”, while occasionally suffering from being over-shot and choppy, contains several visual motifs and aesthetic nuances that clearly stem from a competent director, and demonstrate that fluent film language isn’t dead to films geared toward children. But more than all of that, the young lead Alexander Ludwig does an incredibly impressive job of carrying this film with dignity and restraint not often seen by actors of his age. “The Seeker”, at a glance, may not offer anything new to an audience that’s been satiated by a steady of diet of Harry Potter and “Lord of the Rings”, but it should not be altogether dismissed, particularly for young audiences who can handle the scary imagery and intense situations. This burst of competent fantasy is a welcome surprise in a film season otherwise overrun with depressing reality.
- Jim Tudor

If you'd actually read the book, you'd be setting everyone involved in this fucker on FIRE.
Judging from the trailer only, which I admit isn't completely fair, all they kept were the names. Fucking awful.
Hel-lo Grady,
There's no need to hold back, we're all friends here. Just say what you REALLY think! ;-)
Andrew Cunningham - No, I haven't read the book, and don't necessarily deem such source material as vital when reviewing adaptations. When I do happen to be familiar with source material, I comment on it. But even them, books and films are apples and oranges.
Grady Hendrix - to answer your question, nope, I'm not on crack. I think it's fair to say this film wasn't made with you in mind, although I can understand your re-action to it. It just so happens that if I was a kid, I would dig this. It wouldn't change my life of anything, but it would certainly outrank a lot of the more pandering entries into the adolescent fantasy genre, Walden Media produced and otherwise.
Hey, Jim. You're not on crack? Well, darn! Based on your review of this flick I thought you had a direct line on the good stuff and I was going to ask that you share your connection. Oh, well. Kudos to you for sitting through this junk and not coming out of it with your faith in humanity completely destroyed and a desire to kill, kill, kill, kill, kill burning in your heart.
Every time a studio asks children to open their mouths and say "Ah" so they can direct a stream of putrid, plastic drivel like this into it I just go completely berserk. It's definitely my problem.
Sigh... I've heard very few good things about this one. Between this and the recent "Stardust" adaptation, my faith in fantasy adaptations has taken a bit of a hit.
Walden Media? Ugh! That first Narnia film they put out was nearly end to end watered down crap (especially when compared with quite similarly themed/structured Pan's Labyrinth which is much closer to a perfect version of that type of story.)
I was however a fan of Stardust. I found lots in there to love in a Joss Whedon sort of 'fun' way.
I remember reading all five books in the Dark Is Rising cycle when I was in high school. Years later I can't remember much detail from them, other than loving them when I did read them, and the books instilling into me a desire to learn more about Wales, and how to properly pronounce Welsh (especially names).
I have yet to see anything (after moderate searching) to indicate that there will be more than just this one movie. That alone is doing the book series a severe injustice. The best analogy I can come up with is what Bakshi did to The Lord of the Rings. I'm not in any way implying that The Dark Is Rising cycle is anywhere near the level of LotR, but hopefully it gets the idea across.
The trailer, and website don't feel like the people associated with the movie read the book at all, let alone know that there are other books to it.
I'm glad to see more fantasy-styled movies coming out, even if they do turn out to be dreck. At least it gives us a little more variety.
Walden, to their credit, made AROUND THE WORLD IN 80 DAYS, Jackie's best Hong Kong movie since the 90s, never mind that it's not from Hong Kong.