The Coffin

TIFF Report: THE MOTHER OF TEARS Review

by Kurt Halfyard, September 7, 2007 9:17 PM

Where to start with the latest Dario Argento exercise in baroque phantasmagoria? This is the very-late-to-the-party conclusion of his “Three Mothers Trilogy” started in 1977 with the spectacular Suspiria. (Inferno was to follow 3 years later before a 27 year gap!) As painful as it is to write this, there is nothing on offer in Mother of Tears for folks outside of the cult-of-Argento or gore-hounds looking for a few inventive kills. This may very well be an indication that Argento’s brand of horror was of its time and place (the 1970s and 80s), and ill equipped to survive in the 21st Century. The old is not destined to be repurposed to the new. There is something tragic when the supposed return-to-form of one of the great masters comes off like an ill-conceived parody of his own work.

Two interns, Sarah (Asia Argento) and Giselle (Coralina Cataldi-Tassoni) foolishly open an ancient urn shipped priority courier from a catholic priest with a letter marked with some urgency that the package is for the Museum director’s discretion only. Within the opening minutes, demons are on the loose, blood is splattered on the wall, and a creepy little monkey (aren’t they all?) is prowling the halls of Romes Museum of Ancient Art. It is all rather abrupt, but the elements are creepy, and the gore is effective. Daria Nicolodi’s (The director’s life-partner) disembodied voice which aids Sarah’s escape from the museum is further evidence that great things are to come.

But.

When witches start flying, driving and walking into Rome looking like leftovers from a 1980s glam-rock concert, well things get rather silly over scary. Argento seems to have trouble visually the scope of terror incited by the opening of the urn, and the release of uber-witch, The Mother of Tears. The cops think Sarah is a nut with her explanation of demons and creepy-monkeys, yet the city is truly tearing itself apart. One of the last remaining Exorcist specialists in Rome (a hammy Udo Kier) keeps a collection of possessed zombies in his back courtyard, murder, rape, and a surprisingly lengthy smashing of a car are shown in montage, yet the mocking detectives are intent on following around Sarah anyway. There are mothers casually tossing their infants off bridges (and because this is an Argento film, the baby has to smack the foundation a few times before losing a limb on the way down) in broad daylight, yet airports and bus stations are curiously unsuspicious of flamboyant goth-witches loudly cavorting about. In fact, Mother of Tears makes a real case for Italy’s progress in an urban apocalypse situation. Even though the city is on fire, public transit is still operating smoothly and efficiently, shuttling the main characters around to different locations to get tidbits of exposition from cameoing Argento regulars. Any weight or potential gristly horror in the well executed splatter moments is lost in the silliness of the affair. If this is Peter Jackson or Jake West making a splatter comedy, that is one thing, but this is Dario Argento. Crushed under the expectations of his own reputation.

Even ignoring the less-than-stellar acting, plotting and spatial inconsistencies (a laundry list of epic proportions) throughout Mother of Tears, when the Claudio Simonetti score kicks into high gear and Sarah, newly armed with her ghost-mothers advice and spiritual powers goes in to kick some witch-heiny, there is a moment when all could be forgiven. But this is squandered by the bargain basement look (wildly imaginative set design being one of the hallmarks of Argento’s work) that makes the second-coming of evil look like a basement hair-band video, complete with power-talisman frock passed around like that gaudily stained rag your sister bought at a Poison concert when she was more than a little wasted. The big show down ends with a whimper (it was that easy?) and a bang (big special effects moment) to a final matted shot that confirms, that yes, this is a parody.

 
 

8 Comments

user-pic

Bloody hell (haha) Kurt,

Did you actually see anything at TIFF yet that you liked?
Seems like the meetings at the bar are the most positive things in Toronto at the moment!

user-pic

Damn, it's not breaking news that Argento is way pass is prime. But I was really looking forward to this one. Still gonna watch it but this review lowered my expectations quite a bit, maybe thats a good thing... i just hope it has a cinematic release here in Portugal so I can at least enjoy it in the big screen.

user-pic

Thanks for the early review. I still want to see Dario's new one, though, as reviews -- good and bad -- rarely affect my cinematic cravings. One question, however, and this is of utmost importance: Does Asia have a nude scene?

user-pic

Nice review, but... :,(

Did the print screened look finished? Sounds like most of the issues taken aren't the sort to be fixed in post, just curious if there's still some tweaking to be done before it hits other screens.

What was the crowd reaction like?

user-pic

It was a finished print for sure, and I enjoyed the hell out of it.

I wrote a review here: http://www.filmcatcher.com/member/152/blogs/97/

user-pic

the trailer and concept for this one had my hopes up, but the last few films I have seen from Argento were all poor to very bad so in a way this negative review doesn't surprise me. Maybe with these kind of films it's not only the director that determines the look of the end product but also the production team and the kind of money that he has to work with...

user-pic

I haven't seen any of Argento's films before and I really don't know if I want to after seeing this train wreck. The ending was so anti-climactic that it couldn't have been anything BUT a joke.

It's a shame though. In the first few minutes of the movie you see a woman strangled by her own intestines and then... nothing. It all goes downhill (and it wasn't all that high a hill to start with.)

user-pic

definitely a finished print yes. Crowd loved laughing at/with the film, but most folks I talked with tonite are on the same page that it is a pretty bad film that can work with a large crowd of people willing to chuckle at the silliness of the film at times.

Yes, there is an Asia nude scene, it's brief though and from a strange angle.

Oh and I've seen films at TIFF so far that I"ve liked, some of them covered here:

The Orphanage is great, as is Jar City and guy Maddin's My Winnipeg. Jason Reitmen's Ellen Page starring JUNO is laugh out loud very often (review coming) and Andrei Zvyagintsev's follow up to The Return, THE BANISHMENT is also excellent. Thus far for me, I'm batting less than .500 in terms of good films and I've not found a GREAT one yet. Still a week more to go.