Angel Heart

The Banquet Review

by Ard Vijn, December 7, 2006 2:14 AM

banquet.jpg

This weekend I finally saw Feng Xiaogang's sumptuous "The Banquet". I was led to believe this was the umpteenth retelling of Shakespeare's Hamlet, but having actually seen the movie I’m puzzled. Did any other version of Hamlet ever make me root for the evil uncle?

Reviews for “The Banquet” here at Twitch are positive, but on the net they can be found ranging from gushingly positive all the way to vitriolically negative. I hope I can explain why.

Todd's Review
Mack's Review

The story: “The Banquet” is a period-drama that takes place in medieval China. The emperor has just been murdered by his brother, who wastes no time usurping the throne. Immediately he tries to assassinate all other possible candidates, the most obvious of these being the crown prince who has exiled himself after his childhood sweetheart married his father. This crown prince turns out to be hard to kill though, and shows up at the imperial palace only to find his sweetheart-slash-stepmother remarried to his father’s murderer. Needless to say tensions mount in the following weeks. This culminates in a banquet where most of the invited have at least one murder planned, and the audience is shown that no amount of calculation can take into account some people’s temper, stupidity or that fatal combination of both: love.
So yes, it’s another typically Asian Tragic Romance.

As it’s also a HISTORICAL Asian Tragic Romance I won’t be able to avoid comparison with “Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon” (further to be called CTHD here), particularly since the two movies share a lot of crewmembers.
In short “The Banquet” looks productionwise like CTHD-heavy, while storywise it’s CTHD-light.

Much has been said about the epic art direction by Tim Yip, and I’ll say a bit more: it’s astounding. Seriously, we’ve heard about torture-porn and special effects-porn, but if such a thing exists as art direction-porn this movie is it. Every couple of minutes you’re introduced to a new beautiful set and/or new costumes, and even while most of the film is dark they all look better than splendid. This team won Oscars for CTHD but has also already won several awards for “The Banquet”, and I won’t dispute any of those. Sumptuous doesn’t begin to describe it and the trailers have only shown a fraction. Tip: when you first receive the Hong Kong DVD, start chapter 10 and watch for a minute (spoiler-safe). Now pick up your jaw and go watch the whole movie.

All these beautiful sets are nicely shot in lingering shots. Director Feng Xiaogang can be forgiven for allowing so many slow panning shots, as these gave me as a member of the audience the chance to take in all of the details.
All this is underscored with a fitting soundtrack by Tan Dun which is more pleasant than memorable, and at the moment I cannot tell yet if subsequent hearings will turn me into a rabid fan of the man or not.

Yuen Woo Ping (who is also billed as Executive Producer) does the fight scenes, which proves to be something of a double-edged sword. Like lots of people I loved CTHD but felt taken out of the story when the first fight started. All of a sudden there was this obvious wirework, with people bobbing unrealistically through the air. I know several people who just stopped watching at that point, no longer able to get immersed in the story.
Same here so consider yourself warned: it’s jump around city. Whatever it is you use to fight with, including crossbows, it’s apparently easier when jumping ten feet straight up in the air.
But, and this is the point, it looks so damned good! Just look at the theatre fight. We’ve seen most of these acrobatics before (well, granted, all the blood and flying body parts were new to me) but it still is stunning and makes excellent use of the set, with Imperial Guards running up and sliding down a huge ramp.

(As a side note, these Imperial Guards are an uncommonly useless bunch. They are obviously badasses and look the part, but they consistently fail to assassinate the right person. Worse even: when they are specifically ordered to protect the emperor they... well, let’s put it this way: if I would go to North Korea to kill Kim Jong-il and arrive at the palace, and the army is between me and him, and I wave my gun and say: "Stand aside, I have business with your master only!" would they actually stand aside? I don't think so, and it's probably because Kim Jong-il doesn’t use these Imperial Guards. End of side note.)

Which leaves the story and acting, and this is where some people get angry.
Daniel Wu and Ziyi Zhang play the crown prince and the stepmother, but for me it’s Ge You who runs away with the movie.
Not that there’s anything wrong with Daniel Wu but he unfortunately doesn’t have much to work with. This has a lot to do with the changes made to the original Hamlet story. Hamlet is very passive, but his monologues always give the audience reasons why he doesn’t just kill his uncle. In “The Banquet” these monologues have all disappeared, which makes our crown prince just look sullen. Is he meant to be our hero? If he is it’s just because the audience must assume it. We’re never shown a reason why we should sympathize with him (nearly being murdered doesn’t count as characterization).
It doesn’t help that we never get to know anything about the events concerning his self-imposed exile. Why did his father marry the crown prince's girlfriend? Did the crown prince hate either of them afterwards? We just don’t know. Seeing him rape his arranged fiancée in anger doesn’t get me on his side either.

The opposite happens with the usurper. The only thing we know about the previous emperor is that he married his son’s girlfriend, so what are we supposed to feel when we’re told as an audience that he’s been murdered? Maybe the emperor was a total bastard and his brother had good reason. Subsequently it makes it difficult to hate him for the actions he takes afterwards. Sure, the man is ruthless but he certainly has a point when he says any other action would get him killed immediately (which the screenplay supports), and he shows distaste for the foul acts he occasionally has to order. The so-called “bad guy” is more interesting here than the hero ever is, and Ge You is absolutely a delight to watch in the role.
A far better opponent to the usurper than the underwritten and bland crown prince is the empress. As played by Ziyi Zhang she resembles Lady Macbeth and she is once again very good. Some people may hate her in whatever she does but they have yet to convince me. There is definite chemistry and tenderness between the empress and the usurper and this always helps in selling the story.
Every Asian Tragic Romance needs an innocent girl to be abused all the time. Zhou Xun fills that thankless role admirably, but like Daniel Wu she only gets a couple of interesting moments.

To round this up: this sounds like a truism but when I watch a movie I want to SEE stuff. I will grudgingly forgive bad logic or holes in a screenplay if there are enough pretty pictures to offset this, so for me “The Banquet” delivers in spades. Failing an interesting hero the movie never quite reaches the quality of its own art direction (unlike CTHD) but I wasn’t bored for any of its minutes. I think I understand the gripes and "oscar-bait" remarks from the nay-sayers, but I just don't agree with them.
So I definitely recommend this and as luck would have it there are several good English-friendly versions of this on DVD:

The Hong Kong version
The Hong Kong special edition
The Mainland China super special with cd and wooden Sword!

(And yes I'm easily bewitched by special editions)

The Hong Kong special edition is supposedly sold out but check the 'Newly Restocked' button and you might get lucky.
I cannot vouch for the A/V quality of the Mainland China version but the set looks impressive, includes the soundtrack cd,a replica sword and is temporarily sold for a 50% discount.

That's all folks!

More from Banquet, The:

More from Banquet, The:

 
 

14 Comments

user-pic

Can't wait, pure and simple. Though I'll have to.

Though... Xiaogang has a reputation as a director of fluff? I was unaware of this - Big Shot's Funeral is a satire on rampant commercialism IIRC and from what I've heard of his mainland productions before that apart from his first they're not without meaning and subtext. Even Cellphone's got some level of social commentary, hasn't it? Still, the only one I've actually seen is still A World Without Thieves, which admittedly is slick but empty stuff. Anyway, I knew he was thought of as mainstream, just not as vacant. Oh well. Here's hoping I share your enthusiasm, Todd. :D

user-pic

Nite.. one Nite in mongkok, if I remember correctly.

Funny though, this is the first positive review of the movie that I have heard of. News has been that it is laughable, but it may be exactly what you said: the audience didn't know what to expect

user-pic

"Deadwood" was in iambic pentameter?


(Sorry, couldn't resist)

But thanks for clearing up this point. I'll just have to wait and see. It certainly can't be more theatrical than the last Zhang Ziyi movie I saw at the Rotterdam Festival, which was "Princess Raccoon". Talk about weiiiird. If I hadn't seen "Pom Poko" first I wouldn't have been able to make heads or tails of it.





I get the impression you thought the acting style was fitting for this movie, so in that case there is a good change that I'll like it. Oh, another question: was the soundtrack memorable?

user-pic

Not all of Dedadwood is in iambic, but a surprising amount of it is, yeah, and it's increasing season by season. It's amazing how natural they make it sound ...

And yeah, soundtrack's great. Tan Dun's always good ...

user-pic

Thanks for the review Todd!

user-pic

Nice review. Zhang Ziyi looks hot in the trailer!

user-pic

i attended the Gala Presentation of The Banquet at the 31st Toronto International Film Festival. although i was unable to welcome Ziyi along the red carpet i was seated in the second row, main floor of Roy Thomson Hall. from there, i was able snap two photos and shoot video footage of Ms. Zhang's greeting to the audience. here's a photo i took a brief moment after Zhang and Feng walked on stage: http://www.hinjang.com/media/2006_09150009-Zhang_Ziyi-and-Feng_Xiaogang.jpg i reduced the quality of the photo to 1200 x 900 at 28.346 pixels / centimetre. i can personally attest that past reviews of The Banquet -- the good and not-so good -- are accurate.

user-pic

Spoiler warning:

Who killed Queen Wan??? The Emperor?

user-pic

Jeff you tosser, at least leave a screens length spoiler before writing the spoiler, tool!

user-pic

Well, there you go then, the opinions differ about The Banquet, as they indeed should. My point, though, is that it is quite useless and possibly rather insulting to a lot of people to make statements about "real" Chinese films, because there aren't any. The Banquet and Crazy Stone might not have much in common, but they are both definitely Chinese films. Whether they are any good or not is another question entirely.

user-pic

No, I have to disagree. First off, it's not insulting at all. Second, you don't speak for a lot of people. You speak for yourself. Finally, one can easily argue that a specific film or group of films better represent a particular culture. It's called a national cinema approach and is related to cultural studies. The idea is that to fully understand a film, you must place it in the political and aesthetic climate that produced it. To quote Timothy Corrigan from A Short Guide to Writing About Film, "An Ameican spectator might have little trouble comprehending a Kurosawa film, but without guidance and some cultural background on Japanese society, the films of Kenji Mizoguchi or Mikio Naruse might seem too foreign and confusing for the average American student." As you yourself have alluded too, Crazy Stone would most likely be difficult for many non-Chinese to understand because of its cultural aspects such as language and dialect. I argue that there is little cultural depth to be found in The Banquet beyond what you physicall see/hear on the screen. In other words, aside from the actors, costumes, sets, language, etc, there are very few ties to Chinese culture. On the other hand, I could easily make a case for Crazy Stone as a representative Chinese text because of its cultural depth.

Well, there you go then, opinions differ about The Banquet, as they indeed should. That's not in dispute. My point, though, is that it is quite useful and never insulting to anyone to argue for such things as culturally representative films, because there are many. The Banquet and Crazy Stone might not have much in common, and they are both definitely Chinese films, but one could argue that one film is more "Chinese" and culturally significant than the other using certain approaches. Take films from the Hong Kong New Wave in the 1980s and early 1990s for example. At a time when Hong Kong was trying coming to terms with its multiculturalism and sense of identity, many filmmakers such as Tsui Hark and Ann Hui started making films using local dialects and focusing on local issues. Film is very subjective, but that doesn't mean we can't make a case for our opinions based on cultural research. Stop being so close-minded.

user-pic

Ardvark, regarding the wrap on your review, I couldn't agree more. But I never rooted for Ge You as the evil uncle. Or Daniel Wu. Or Zhang Ziyi. I was in all the way for Huang Xiaoming, who plays The Minister's Son with incredible intensity for the few moments he's onscreen.

But you should really try and (re)watch The Banquet on the biggest theatre you can find (as I did in Rio's Film Festival)- it's a beast of a movie.

user-pic

Krivochein, you're absolutely right. It's a small role but he stands out.


And I'll certainly try to catch this at Rotterdam Film Festival next month if possible.
-----

user-pic

I'm Chinese and I enjoy and welcome good films with ancient China as a background. Shaw Brothers produced a number of historical epics (Empress Wu, Yang Guifei,Diao Chan, Beyond the Great Wall, Kingdom and the Beauty) during the 60's and I hope to see a continuation of this genre from China.
-----