Prague

REVIEW OF NIGHT WATCH

by Canfield, February 25, 2006 2:55 AM

nightwatch4.jpg

Should you watch? And if so should you watch during the day or night? I'm of the opinion that it doesn't matter. This film should be equally empty for humans, "others", vampires, shapeshifters or any other life form that is unlucky enough to go in with anything but the lowest expectations. Forget the great trailers and the nice poster art and settle down for the cinematic equivalent of left over ghoulash.

Night Watch is about a war that doesn't involve you or I or in any real sense- the human race. Maybe that's why I just didn't find it very compelling. Then again a coherent, original story might have helped. But like most other films that treat the vampire as a sort of “other” locked into some great struggle Night Watch misses being a movie you can really care about settling in the end for visual bombast.

Underworld got it right for my money. A great visual aesthetic, married to fun action sequences and above all a sense of itself as a film that was there to be enjoyed not adopted as some sort of mythology. It could support video games, comics, virtually any narrative or image driven form because it knew the most important thing about itself. Viewer's interfaced with it as an excuse for delving into the fantasy of being an “other.” Themselves. What would it feel like to have superhuman/supernatural powers?

And Underworld, Blade, even Bloodrayne have re-imagined the vampire as a warrior figure, a conflicted soul caught between base bloodlust and the need for redemption/wholeness. But in Night Watch the vampire is imagined as merely a player among players who themselves may or may not be pawns in a confusing cosmic narrative.

The movie sets up it's central situation neatly enough. We learn that light and dark “others” have always existed within mankind and that those “others “ have, after a series of battles devastating to both sides entered into an uneasy truce. Shape-shifters, vampires, seers and other “others” have divided their dominion of the earth into day and night. They keep tabs on each other using the “other” equivalents of the FBI and that would be fine if the movie used that to the same sort of advantage that we've come to expect. But instead that serves as only background info and the result is plot mud.

To the filmmakers credit they try something not altogether original but at least different. We meet a young man who has been pressed into service by the light side as a seer who in turn begins to discover things about his past leading him in search of a young woman with a child who are also others. This is as much as I'll reveal about the plot since you can probably guess the rest anyway. But even this mystery leading to cataclysmic events never gets more energy flowing than the average made for TV Sci-Fi mini-series.

My guess is genre lovers will want this on DVD to look at repeatedly. Sections of it, particularly the owl transformation, are truly wonderful to behold. And the film does possess a certain gritty power especially near the beginning during the witch sequence. But it quickly becomes apparent that the film can't possibly tie up it's many unnecessary loose ends. At one point we show a plane in danger of crashing. A plane does indeed crash. Then we see a plane landing safely. Is it the same plane- a different plane? Perhaps this safely landing plane is from another plane altogether where the screenplay of Night Watch made sense. It's a question the filmmakers don't resolve for us. And what of the swirling tornadic funnel that seems to attract crows even though it contains nothing shiny? Don't funnels suck we think? Especially when they seem to appear only to disguise the bland Matrix did it better (heck Matrix two did it better) chosen one storyline that the film devolves into?

And what of the screaming woman? Trust me. When she screams you'll think “Where is David Lynch right now? He had a screaming woman in Twin Peaks didn't he? I wonder if he is still trying to get those silly temples built? Perhaps I'm watching an outtake from Dune? This movie is like Dune- it has a chosen one.

Perhaps I as a reviewer should take this film more seriously. Break it down more pointedly. The bottom line is, as good intentioned as Night Watch is, it doesn't deserve your money or more importantly your time unless you are bored, easily amused, or just plain desperate to see something work out for Russian genre film. I resisted the urge to go online and watch Night Watch all the through. The film has been made available that way but is sped up superfast- interesting marketing. Now I regret that decision. I am convinced that this is the only way to make this film interesting. At least then I would have been able to tick another film off on my seen it list withoutb giving away a full two hours of my life.

 
 

8 Comments

user-pic

From IMDB (to elaborate on the cuts Fox made and the subtitle issues)

Fox cut several sequences, the most enjoyable of which was a sequence in which a Light Other named Ignat, whose special power is the ability to seduce any woman at will, is brought out of retirement to assist the Night Watch. The other sequences aren't that important, and won't be missed.

Other than the cut sequences, there are two fundemental changes in the Fox version:

1) In the original version, Anton is a computer programmer, a "sys-op", who's brought out from behind the desk and thrust into field work. In the Fox version, Anton is "seer", an Other whose special power is seeing visions of future events. The Fox version includes new footage and "incorrect" subtitles (the subtitles are completely unrelated to the underlying spoken dialogue) which develop this theme.

2) The original version was a morality play in which a weak and flawed hero, Anton Gorodetsky, comes to terms with the meaning of good and evil in the morally ambiguous world of the Others. The Anton we see at the beginning, geeky and nerdy, who, on the word of a witch, is willing to murder the unborn child in his own wife's womb, is not the same Anton we see at the end, who, when asked by the Vampiress Larissa why she can't suck human blood, without any doubts about who is or what he is doing, calmly and confidently answers, "Because I won't let you." There was also a strong pro-life theme in the original.

Fox has nervously removed all moral themes, and attempted to make it play as a straightforward action/adventure flick. In particular, the pro-life theme has been totally removed (which makes some scenes confusing). They've done this with editing, both removing and adding dialogue, and changing the sequence of several events.

user-pic

The comparison to Underworld is apt. Underworld is bland, badly acted (yes, even the great Bill Nighy stinks in that film), and more-or-less creatively bankrupt. The Nightwatch (and I've only seen the Russian cut, so we are likely talking apples to oranges here) is gritty, creative, ambitiously EPIC (it is not surpringly based on a Russian pulp series) and for that I will forgive some of its failures. Too much stuff crammed into too little time, but hey, there are two more films on the way, hopefully things will tie together as a whole when all is said and done. And the film, for me, just exudes 'Russian-ness'. I just love the large apartment building int he middle of nowhere, where the cursed lady lives!

Also thanks Madison for the breakdown of the moral arc of Anton. I think that was in the back of my mind when I watched the film (I've seen it three times to date), but you put out there explicitly. Nice.

Since the original film is confusing enough (especially the first time around, it makes much more sense with subsequent viewings), i can only imagine how patchwork the story must be if they cut out 20+ minutes. But Fox will probably see my money, cause I want to get a look at those graphic subtitles....Great Idea, that.

user-pic

You need to see the sequel!

The Russian DVD is sadly without subs, but it looks fantastic!

And the quality is near-perfect.

user-pic

Does anybody know where i can order the Russian DVD? Does it have English subs? Or at least any DVD version which contains the original Russian cut WITH english subs???

user-pic

Nice one Canfield! I think that is the most spot on review I have read of this movie yet - Absolutely to the penny!

user-pic

Wow, this new, edited version must be pretty bad, because I saw the full, uncut Russian version over a year ago and I thought that was instantly forgettable...ditto Underworld and Blade. All lifeless dreck...so have at it, folks!

user-pic

Eh. Not exactly in the same genre, but since there's a certain similarly in the imagery I believe the Hungarian film Kontroll was far superior.

user-pic

"But it quickly becomes apparent that the film can't possibly tie up it's many unnecessary loose ends."

Did you review this movie without even knowing that it's the first film of a trilogy? That makes the review rather worthless.
-----