Yes, it's a vampire movie in which Steven Seagal is the sword-wielding leader of a military trained squad of vampire hunters and it looks every bit as horrible as you'd expect. And in this case horrible means horribly entertaining. It's Against The Dark and you'll find the trailer embedded below the break. Hey, it's a Seagal flick with a three word title, so it can't be all bad, right?
I will not watch this. I WOULD watch Steven Seagal as Dracula. So you just come back when that's happening.
Sensei we love you, finally some worthy opponents.... Vampires:))
Will someone cast SS in a good movie? Come on even Jean Claude Van Dame made a come-back
Why can I not look away!?! Why do I love (HATE) his movies so very much! I'd rather watch every Seagal movie than many supposedly "good" movies.
I wish he was a vampire so he would never die and make movies forever!!!!!
I'm wondering what Vern thinks of this career move...
I'm trying to find some word to say about what I just saw but forget it... lol
There is something oddly tawdry and yet comforting about this run-of-the-mill Seagal flic. I am eager to flip by it on USA cable when it hits TV.
They should have gone with zombies if you ask me.
Ah good. Keeps the three word Seagal movie title rule. That's all that matters.
I see what Seagal did there.
well ive just read that its only a cameo (or extended cameo) of more or less 15 minutes spread throughout the movie. not sure if this really qualify as a steven seagal movie...thats a shame!
Garbage
kinda like Blade.
but with a white guy.
who's not a vampire.
Zwar. That's basically his career now. Show up for a couple of days, shoot his scenes, gets paid and gets the fuck out. The producers have a marketable name and every body wins, except Seagal's dignity.
The last second of the trailer is just for showing off the lens flare again, i guess.